Problem with the fix to PR 10234

[Joe Buck]

Once again:

I wrote:
> > The fix to PR 10234 was erroneous.  Sorry I missed it, but it should
> > have been closed as "not a bug".  The fact that the URL printed by
> > released compilers for bug report instructions points to

> > http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html
> > 
> > and not to gcc.gnu.org was something that RMS asked for and that the
> > SC agreed to.

On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 03:40:50PM -0800, Janis Johnson wrote:
> Shall I revert these?

We heard back from RMS.

RMS still wants all GNUware to point to http://www.gnu.org/software/xxx
(though there's a proposal to use xxx.gnu.org for all major tools and
this may happen in the future).  So the decision is that we need to
revert, at least for now.  He wants all the tools to follow a consistent
policy, so we might be able to change it to the way many would prefer
at some future point (at which time there would be a gdb.gnu.org,
binutils.gnu.org, etc, though these might just be virtual hosts).

Please adjust all references in the documentation and GCC itself
accordingly.  This has to be done before any new release.  Sorry.

Joe


-- 
Q. What's more of a headache than a bug in a compiler.
A. Bugs in six compilers.  -- Mark Johnson