Doxygen for tree-ssa
Daniel Berlin
dberlin@dberlin.org
Mon Nov 25 17:43:00 GMT 2002
On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 12:49 PM, Bosscher Steven Civ
USAFA/DFAN wrote:
>
> Hmm, this is extremely frustrating...
>
> Stuff like this:
>
> Partial references
> ------------------
>
> To deal with arrays and structures, we use the concept of
> non-killing
> definitions. When an array location or structure element is
> defined,
> the SSA builder will consider that a partial definition of the array
> itself. Partial definitions are modeled by keeping an SSA link
> (def-def link) between the current definition and the previous one.
>
> This is used to chain definitions to arrays and structures, so that
> all
> possible reaching defs can be found later by compute_tree_rdefs.
> For
> instance,
>
> 1 A[i] = 5;
> 2 A[j] = 10;
> 3 y = A[k] + 10;
>
> looks *very* ugly in HTML. The "---" line is put right after "Partial
> references", the example gets collapsed into a single line, etc... Not
> very
> pretty. (I really miss an @example or @verbatim tag in Doxygen...)
>
> The solution apparently is to
get rid of partial references, which we are doing.
:)
More information about the Gcc
mailing list