Doxygen for tree-ssa

Daniel Berlin dberlin@dberlin.org
Mon Nov 25 17:43:00 GMT 2002


On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 12:49  PM, Bosscher Steven Civ 
USAFA/DFAN wrote:

>
> Hmm, this is extremely frustrating...
>
> Stuff like this:
>
>    Partial references
>    ------------------
>
>    To deal with arrays and structures, we use the concept of 
> non-killing
>    definitions.  When an array location or structure element is 
> defined,
>    the SSA builder will consider that a partial definition of the array
>    itself.  Partial definitions are modeled by keeping an SSA link
>    (def-def link) between the current definition and the previous one.
>
>    This is used to chain definitions to arrays and structures, so that 
> all
>    possible reaching defs can be found later by compute_tree_rdefs.  
> For
>    instance,
>
>               1  A[i] = 5;
>               2  A[j] = 10;
>               3  y = A[k] + 10;
>
> looks *very* ugly in HTML. The "---" line is put right after "Partial
> references", the example gets collapsed into a single line, etc... Not 
> very
> pretty. (I really miss an @example or @verbatim tag in Doxygen...)
>
> The solution apparently is to
get rid of partial references, which we are doing.
:)



More information about the Gcc mailing list