Effect of -fno-reorder-blocks?
Hans-Peter Nilsson
hans-peter.nilsson@axis.com
Mon Nov 18 11:34:00 GMT 2002
> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 11:46:17 -0500
> From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com>
> On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
>
> > If this is simple for you to check, can I please ask you to do a
> > comparative SPECint{95, 2000} run with and without
> > -fno-reorder-blocks together with whatever other flags you use
> > with -O2, for main trunk and perhaps also the 3.2 branch?
> Sure. I've added -fno-reorder-blocks to both SPEC2000 and SPEC95
> runs.
Thanks!
FWIW, I see only that change in the SPEC95 results. Nothing
below <URL:http://people.redhat.com/dnovillo/spec2000/> mentions
use of -fno-reorder-blocks. Though the SPEC95 result seems is
conclusive; if -fno-reorder-blocks really was of any *general*
positive effect (i.e. if the code conditioned by
flag_reorder_blocks caused general pessimization), it should be
visible in those results.
> They should take effect in tonight's run (5:00 UTC).
I see nothing conclusive about the effect of -fno-reorder-blocks
when running SPEC95.
Note to others: the changes (some for better, some for worse) in
results listed for SPEC95 at 2002-11-14 do not seem to be
related to this change: by log inspection use of
-fno-reorder-blocks *was* there for the 2002-11-13 run, and then
there was no apparent change in testsuite results.
Thanks again for doing this.
brgds, H-P
More information about the Gcc
mailing list