Assigning priorities to GNATS reports

[Volker Reichelt]

On 15 Nov, Joe Buck wrote:
>> > How about the following:
>> >
>> > [<branch-to-fix> regression (<branch-first>-<branch-last>)]
>> 
>> I don't have any objection to this (the first part is the information
>> I usually want most), but it seems a bit unwieldy to me.  If, however,
>> people think we can maintain that, it's fine by me!
> 
> I think it would be fine to list only <branch-to-fix> in the synopsis
> (preferably in a rigidly consistent form, so we can put regular
> expressions in our GNATS advanced queries).  We need the latter
> info as well, but it could appear in the body of the report somewhere
> (or even in the audit trail, as it will tend to change).

Since the consensus seems to be that marking regressions as
[<branch-to-fix> regression]
is sufficient, I went through the high priority bugs and changed the
synopsis lines accordingly.
I wasn't sure about the status of PR 6746 - could somebody please have a
look?

Greetings,
Volker