Assigning priorities to GNATS reports

[Gabriel Dos Reis]

Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:

[...]

| The point of that is that when we make the 3.3 release branch, the
| [3.3 regression] tags still make sense.  If we decide a defect isn't
| important enough to fix, we'll either downgrade it from high, or,
| perhaps, change the tag to [3.4 regression], meaning fix it in that
| release.  (That might be appropriate for something that can more
| easily be fixed once some functionality we expect in 3.4 will be
| present.)

I find this to be a sensible and more effective approach than we have
now. 100% supported.

-- Gaby