GCC Testing Efforts web page: gcc.gnu.org/testing

[Robert Schiele]

On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 08:22:39AM -0800, Joe Buck wrote:
> 
> > Well, I can provide my ugly bash script (Now even with some
> > documentation!), if someone was interrested.  I think, it might make
> > sense to add something like the following to the first point "Perform
> > regular builds...":
> > 
> >   "<p>You can fetch some simple scripts doing this job for you from <a
> >   href=3D"http://pi3.informatik.uni-mannheim.de/~schiele/autobuild/">this
> >   web site</a>, but note that they are given to you without any
> >   warranty.  They automatically send test results and bootstrap
> >   failure reports to the gcc-testresults mailing list.  PLEASE read
> >   the documentation BEFORE using them!</p>"
> 
> Nothing provided by the FSF (or other free software providers) has a
> warranty.  If you want to warn people that something is probably not
> robust, "no warranty" probably isn't a good way to do it.

Ok, I just wanted to express, that the script was not well tested in
multiple environments.  But I do not strongly depend on that
expression, you may replace that with some better expression or even
skip that part of the sentence completely.

Robert

-- 
Robert Schiele			Tel.: +49-621-181-2517
Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker	mailto:rschiele@uni-mannheim.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 481 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/attachments/20021114/b0107833/attachment.sig>