GCC Testing Efforts web page: gcc.gnu.org/testing

[Tom Lord]

Swell.  You're mistaken to say "contrary" -- since the effort you
point towards is predicated on the same assessment I offered.  But
swell.

So, as previously mentioned, here's some tools and a development
effort that can help a lot and that deserves both your and your
employer's support -- or at least your open-minded inquiry, for a
change.

-t



   Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
   Precedence: bulk
   List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gcc-unsubscribe-lord=emf.net@gcc.gnu.org>
   List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
   List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
   List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
   Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
   X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
   From: Ben Elliston <bje@redhat.com>
   Date: 14 Nov 2002 17:59:02 +1100
   Organization: Red Hat Asia-Pacific Pty Ltd
   Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
   X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1037257040 16904 216.138.202.10 (14 Nov 2002 06:57:20 GMT)
   X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
   NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 06:57:20 +0000 (UTC)
   User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley)
   Cache-Post-Path: scooby!unknown@localhost
   X-Cache: nntpcache 3.0.1 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
   X-UIDL: 6d63906c51d8c6fb29e062cc14a9f2bb

   >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lord <lord@emf.net> writes:

     Tom> Y'all are doing far too much work "by hand".

   On the contrary, Tom.  Some of us are automating the living daylights
   out of it.

   Ben