GCC 3.2 Branch Closure

[Joe Buck]

Mark writes:
> I believe that HJ's patch for x86 clears up the last of the significant
> silent code generation problems, and Joe is right that we have fixed a
> ton of regressions in GCC 3.2.1; we should get that compiler out there
> in the wild, and start focusing on GCC 3.3, and GCC 3.2.2 if necessary.

Of the remaining nasty bugs against 3.2.1, Franz Sirl says he has a fix
for 8467 and asked for approval to merge it.  What's the status on that
one?  (see the GNATS log).