Error on the development plan web page?

[Gerald Pfeifer]

On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Phil Edwards wrote:
> While cleaning out old mail, and maintaining this thread's tradition
> of one reply per month, I came across:

;-)

>> Perhaps we should differentiate between "development branches" and
>> "release branches"?  Opinions?
> That sounds useful.  How about this?

Yes, this looks fine. Thanks!

> +<p>Although maintaining a development branch, including merging new
> +changes from the mainline, is somewhat burdensome, the absolute worst
> +case is that such a branch will have to be maintained for four months.

BTW, should it read "absolutely" in the sentence above? (This was not
touched by your patch, but I just noticed it as part of the diff.)

Gerald
-- 
Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/