PR 8146
H. J. Lu
hjl@lucon.org
Wed Nov 6 20:38:00 GMT 2002
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 05:44:17PM -0800, Joe Buck wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 05:24:03PM -0800, Joe Buck wrote:
> > > HJ writes:
> > >
> > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-08/msg01170.html
> > > >
> > > > fixes 5351 and 7591.
>
> I wrote:
> > > I have confirmed this; the patch works. However, it doesn't have
> > > an effect on 8146.
>
> However, I am seeing a new failure:
>
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/rbug.c execution, -O1
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/rbug.c execution, -O2
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/rbug.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/rbug.c execution, -O3 -g
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/rbug.c execution, -Os
Please provide more info.
>
> Unfortunately there is a complication: for the two testsuite runs I'm
> comparing, the first is 20021105, the second is 20021106. However,
> it seems there are no relevant changes (I see one new patch to xtensa
> support and that's it).
20021105 works fine for me. I reported my test result.
>
> It's possible that I've made some mistake here, but I think that your
> patch may be causing this regression. Could you check?
I am doing that now.
H.J.
More information about the Gcc
mailing list