help with different treatment of asms in 3.2 and 3.3?
Michael Matz
matz@suse.de
Tue Nov 5 08:21:00 GMT 2002
Hi again,
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Michael Matz wrote:
> GCC is right here. You don't need (or want) to use register variables
> here. A better way is:
>
> int Int_quot(int numerator, int denominator) {
> __asm__ __volatile__ ("cdq\n idivl %2"
> : "=a" (numerator)
> : "0" (numerator), "rm" (denominator)
> : "edx");
>
> return numerator;
> }
I forgot to mention: The use of asm is nonsensical here anyway. A simple
int Int_quot (int n, int d) { return n / d; }
produces exactly the same code.
Ciao,
Michael.
More information about the Gcc
mailing list