PR 8146

[Paul Jarc]

Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com> wrote:
> Can you confirm, by looking at the output from make bootstrap (you saved
> it, right?), that gcc 3.2 is never given any -O option of any kind?

Yes: the first occurrence of the string "-O" in the make output is on
a line starting with "./xgcc".

> I don't want to hear about values of makefile variables, I want to see
> the actual gcc 3.2 commands that are run.

Ok, well, I have to be interested in the Makefile variables, since
that's how I say what options the gcc 3.2 commands will have.  But it
seems I got it right this last time.  The complete ./configure and
"make bootstrap" output is available here:
<URL:http://multivac.cwru.edu/prj/gcc.log.bz2>


paul