remaining libjava/verify_local_live_at_start failures

[Richard Henderson]

On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 02:52:02PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > If *anything* within a single basic block gets different answers
> > when run multiple times, something is wrong.
> 
> Erm, what exactly you do mean?

Exactly that.  When SCAN_DEAD is set, we pretend that the dead
code has in fact been removed, and compute life accordingly.

> BTW why the dead store removal is integrated in register liveness analysis?

Why not?  The one affects the other.



r~