gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC]

[Robert Dewar]

<<(and I suspect that there are, in fact, several more than two); a
better approach would be to collect those automated testing
infrastructures under a common (automated) interface and make them
available to lots of branches (even branches not maintained by people
with write access to the main repository).
>>

In the case of GNAT, our primary test suite is composed almost entirely
of proprietary code from customers, and cannot be made available. I would
be surprised if that is not the case in other situations.