pointer <-> integer round-up

Alan Lehotsky apl@alum.mit.edu
Wed Mar 20 23:18:00 GMT 2002


At 11:04 PM -0500 3/20/02, Robert Dewar wrote:

><       For any warning given for legal constructs, there must be
>       either a (strongly) portable code change that can eliminate
>       the warning without alterning the meaning of the program,
>       or an option which disables that warning (but no others).
>>>
>
>YOu can state such a rule, but you have not provided a convincing argument
>that it is a desirable rule in my opinion.


	How about the fact that *many* organizations have development processes that require that
	the product builds must compile without any warnings or errors?

	
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------

		    Quality Software Management
		http://home.earthlink.net/~qsmgmt
			apl@alum.mit.edu
			(978)287-0435 Voice
			(978)808-6836 Cell
			(978)287-0436 Fax

	Software Process Improvement and Management Consulting
	     Language Design and Compiler Implementation



More information about the Gcc mailing list