pointer <-> integer round-up
Alan Lehotsky
apl@alum.mit.edu
Wed Mar 20 23:18:00 GMT 2002
At 11:04 PM -0500 3/20/02, Robert Dewar wrote:
>< For any warning given for legal constructs, there must be
> either a (strongly) portable code change that can eliminate
> the warning without alterning the meaning of the program,
> or an option which disables that warning (but no others).
>>>
>
>YOu can state such a rule, but you have not provided a convincing argument
>that it is a desirable rule in my opinion.
How about the fact that *many* organizations have development processes that require that
the product builds must compile without any warnings or errors?
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quality Software Management
http://home.earthlink.net/~qsmgmt
apl@alum.mit.edu
(978)287-0435 Voice
(978)808-6836 Cell
(978)287-0436 Fax
Software Process Improvement and Management Consulting
Language Design and Compiler Implementation
More information about the Gcc
mailing list