odd bootstrap fail on Solaris (3.1 branch): bad Makefile generated

[Joseph S. Myers]

On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Joe Buck wrote:

> checking version of bison... 1.25, bad

We should document the required minimum version somewhere.

> If the final distribution contains the output files gcc/intl/plural.c etc,
> this won't be a problem.  Is that the plan?  We aren't supposed to require
> bison for folks who just use the release.

Why is plural.c in CVS?  Bison-generated files shouldn't be, they should
only be in release tarballs.  (In this case, we'd need to ensure that the
release-building process generates plural.c, even when run on systems that
don't use the intl directory because current libintl is in libc.)

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk