Gcc 3.1 performance regressions with respect to 2.95.3

[Jason Merrill]

>>>>> "Peter" == Peter Schmid <schmid@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> writes:

> It looks that there are some flaws in the -O2 optimizer passes. Is
> there a chance that this is fixed for the upcoming gcc 3.1 release?

It would be helpful if you could provide small examples of the
various pessimizations, like the one I sent out earlier.

Thanks,
Jason