PowerPC Code generation (probably altivec related)

[Aldy Hernandez]

>
> Please note that in the marked line a different register is
> used for the load which is not a problem here since the
> content is the same but shows up as a problem in code I'm

the code generated is correct.  r4 and r3 both contain 0, so it's
fair to use either one as a base register.

> still trying to simplify where the load happens from a completely
> wrong address.

this would be useful.

>
> Removing the static in the declaration of store will result
> in the expected object code but trigger a different (altivec) code
> generation problem for my application:

the assembly looks correct.  what is the problem?

--
Aldy Hernandez                                E-mail: aldyh@redhat.com
Professional Gypsy Lost in Australia
Red Hat, Inc.