GCC trunk SPEC2000 performance

[Andreas Jaeger]

law@redhat.com writes:

> In message <3D125DB3.F3B600B5@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>, Toon Moene writes:
>  > Richard Henderson wrote:
>  > 
>  > > On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 12:02:00AM +0200, Toon Moene wrote:
>  > > > So, OK - that's it.  Addressof makes a MEM out of this register, so we
>  > > > should accept it down the road.
>  > 
>  > > Alternately, we may want to remove it from the reg_rtx array.
>  > 
>  > Well, that would make this code a lot clearer for unsuspecting onlookers
>  > like me :-)
> Or even for suspecting folks ;-)
>
> I think all we'd need to do is clear the entry in the 4 places where we modify
> REGs in-place and turn them into MEMs.  3 are in function.c plus one in reload.
>
> There's the possibility we have code which walks the entries in the reg array
> and isn't prepared for an entry that has been wiped away.  So we should go
> through the usual testing procedures for such a change.

Who's going to do this?  Honza is going on holiday and I fear he won't
have time to fix it before.

Shall I file a GNATS entry for this referring to the discussion?

Thanks,
Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger
  SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
   private aj@arthur.inka.de
    http://www.suse.de/~aj