Creating a tag
law@redhat.com
law@redhat.com
Wed Jun 19 12:44:00 GMT 2002
In message <116410000.1024514895@warlock.codesourcery.com>, Mark Mitchell write
s:
>
>
> --On Wednesday, June 19, 2002 01:21:08 PM -0600 "law@redhat.com"
> <law@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > In message <98810000.1024508455@warlock.codesourcery.com>, Mark Mitchell
> > writes :
> > > I'm trying to create a tag with "cvs tag".
> > >
> > > I started that operation at 9:00 AM; it's now 10:36 AM. I've been
> > > watching "waiting for ...'s lock" messages go by that entire time.
> > > (With different lognames and directories over that time period, but
> > > with the same directories appearing more than once.)
> > That indicates that you're making progress (albiet slowly).
>
> Indeed. As of now (12:24PM), a stream of Ts is going across my screen, so
> it is working. (I bet that means everyone else is waiting for me now,
> but it seems to be tagging several files per second, so hopefully it
> won't be too long...)
>
> > > Does CVS refuse to grab a lock for me until it can grab locks in all of
> > > the directories at once, or some such? (Such a protocol might be in
> > > use to avoid deadlock.)
> > Not that I'm aware of. Which is why I find it interesting that the same
> > directory appeared more than once.
>
> Here are some examples:
>
> cvs server: [09:08:08] waiting for sje's lock in /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc
> cvs server: [09:15:39] waiting for anoncvs's lock in /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc
> cvs server: [10:27:37] waiting for rth's lock in /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc
> cvs server: [10:41:30] waiting for anoncvs's lock in /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc
> cvs server: [10:45:01] waiting for rth's lock in /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc
Presumably there were other directories interlaced with these?
jeff
More information about the Gcc
mailing list