On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Aldy Hernandez wrote: > this macro is used in regclass and is not defined in any of the > ports. it's also undocumented. I thought I might have a need for it so I looked. It's derived; internal-only for regclass.c. See regclass.c:56 (for 1.150). > can we get rid of this? (Might still be possible; dunno.) brgds, H-P