Convert 3.2 sources to ISO C90

[Stan Shebs]

law@redhat.com wrote:
> 
>  In message <3CFF8DC8.31ED5081@apple.com>, Stan Shebs writes:
>  > But I don't have one, nor do most GCC developers.  We basically
>  > have to rely on the handful of HP maintainers to be the oracles
>  > of whether GCC is properly K&R compatible.
> Oh please.  The stuff we're talking about is trivial -- don't use
> prototypes.  Jesus.

Or anything else in ISO C, like string concatenation.

>  > OK, so let me get this straight - GCC has to have K&R compat because
>  > Red Hat has customers who are too stingy to spring for acc, but who must
>  > have spent lots of money on a support contract if they're getting onsite
>  > support.
> Get real.  Why should anyone (Red Hat customer or not) have to purchase the
> unbundled HP compiler to bootstrap GCC.  The whole point behind that
> was to provide a real world example of the kinds of problems we're going to
> run into if you start ANSI-ifying GCC.

How do people bootstrap on Solaris?  They buy a compiler, or use
a binary package.  How do people get started on Windows?  They cross
compile, or use a binary package.  HP is the one oddball here.

Stan