Why long command line for libgcj.so?

Marc Espie espie@quatramaran.ens.fr
Thu Jun 6 05:30:00 GMT 2002


In article <3CFEDB80.1050200@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> you write:

>Unfortunatly, it probibly will mean longer incremental rebuild times for 
>libgcj hackers, but overall I think the tradeoff is worth it.

Maybe you should have a look at kde's --enable-final infrastructure ?

It's there to handle the same kind of compromise, and it works really great
in kde.



More information about the Gcc mailing list