3.2 vs 3.1 speed

[law@redhat.com]

In message <200206051353.aa01413@gremlin-relay.ics.uci.edu>, Dan Nicolaescu wri
tes:
 > 
 > One of the reasons that 3.2 is slower than 3.1 is that 3.2 just
 > generates a lot more RTL (also see the huge increase in time spent in
 > expand).
Which is rather curious.  What would be even more interesting would be to know
how much of that RTL is due to the RTL inliner and how much is due to the
tree inliner.

jeff