why no gcc3_compiled symbol

Robert Dewar dewar@gnat.com
Wed Jul 31 19:03:00 GMT 2002


> Not to mention the ironic part of all this, which is that other 
> compilers started adding  gcc2_compiled symbols too, defeating the 
> whole purpose of it in the first place.

it's like intel compatible processors pretending they are made  by intel :-)



More information about the Gcc mailing list