Parse error

[Nathan Sidwell]

Matt Austern wrote:
> 
>
> Oh, I know that there are workarounds!  Another workaround,
> of course, is using an explicit temporary.  That's not really what
> I'm interested in.  I'd like to know if (1) there are any arguments
> that the behavior of the 3.1 compiler is correct; and (2) if not,
> whether this is a known bug.
1) no
2) yes http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html#known
3) there is a new parser in the works (again).

nathan

-- 
Dr Nathan Sidwell   ::   http://www.codesourcery.com   ::   CodeSourcery LLC
         'But that's a lie.' - 'Yes it is. What's your point?'
nathan@codesourcery.com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ : nathan@acm.org