Alias analysis - does base_alias_check still work ?
Toon Moene
toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl
Sun Jul 21 15:14:00 GMT 2002
Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2002 at 11:24:00AM +0200, Toon Moene wrote:
> > I combined your MEM_EXPR patch and patch1, but now I get (-O2
> > -funroll-loops -fno-rerun-loop-opt):
> [...]
> > which is worse than you showed for the MEM_EXPR patch alone
> > 32 insns vs 27).
>
> So is the claim that patch1 is dependent on patch2?
Ah, sorry, didn't test because I thought that this would invalidate any
useful testing of patch2.
Will try asap.
--
Toon Moene - mailto:toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phoneto: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html
Join GNU Fortran 95: http://g95.sourceforge.net/ (under construction)
More information about the Gcc
mailing list