Where's the Steengaard stuff supposed to go?

[Steven Bosscher]

Op zo 21-07-2002, om 03:24 schreef Daniel Berlin:
> On 21 Jul 2002, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> 
> > Daniel,
> > 
> > I cannot build G95 anymore since you commited the Steengaard alias
> > analysis stuff. If I link to tree-alias-steen.o, I get a number of
> > errors about a missing function 'create_tmp_alias_var()',
> 
> Errr, this is defined in *-simplify.c, prototyped in tree-simple.h.
> Any SIMPLE implementation is going to need it to do alias analysis, we 
> need to be able to create VAR_DECL's that don't get inserted into the 
> binding level (because we have to create them for intermediate results of 
> expressions that don't directly store, etc, so we end up with possibly a 
> lot of them).

Ah, OK. I couldn't tell from tree-simple.h. If there are more functions
like this (I mean functions defined in a tree-* header, but defined in
*-simplify for each front end), shouldn't we make them langhooks?

Greetz
Steven