ra-debug.c: why?

[Diego Novillo]

On Thu, 2002-07-18 at 07:05, Michael Matz wrote:

> But I definetely prefer seeing
> 
>   4     p59 <= [(h16 + 4)]:DF
> 
> compared with
> 
> (insn:HI 4 3 5 0 (nil) (set (reg/v:DF 59)
>         (mem/f:DF (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 16 argp)
>                 (const_int 4 [0x4])) [3 b+0 S8 A64])) 94 {*movdf_nointeger} (nil)
>     (nil))
> 
Really?  Fantastic!  I've had something like this on my todo list for a
long time now.

How hard would it be to make this dumper generic enough so that we could
have a flag for making *all* RTL dumps using infix notation?

I find the traditional RTL dump notation extremely irritating and very
hard to read.  One gets used to it, but it's still annoying.


Diego.