typedef-named class member functions can be public

[Richard Kenner]

    > This patch fixes the problem.  I can't include the testcase I was
    > given because it's derived from a proprietary testsuite, so I'd
    > appreciate if someone would come up with a testcase based on my
    > description of the problem for the GCC testsuite.  Thanks in advance.
    
    I don't think we need this level of Chinese wall-ness.  You can come
    up with a test case easily enough that doesn't copy the proprietary
    testsuite.

That depends on how critical to the proprietary test case the relevant
part is.  If it's sufficiently critical, I don't believe anybody who's
seen the test case could make a non-proprietary one.

    If we do what you're suggesting, then we're all going to have to be
    writing each other's testcases.

Indeed, this may well be necessary in some cases.