condition codes, haifa-sched and virtual-stack-vars
law@redhat.com
law@redhat.com
Wed Jan 30 18:00:00 GMT 2002
In message <orpu3r1km3.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>, Alexandre Oliva writ
es:
> On Jan 30, 2002, Greg McGary <greg@mcgary.org> wrote:
>
> > In the "movsi" expander, I added this bit:
>
> > if (REG_P (src)
> > && REGNO (src) >= FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER
> > && REGNO (src) <= LAST_VIRTUAL_REGISTER)
>
> I'd take the last condition out. Consider, for example, that you have
> a very large stack frame, such that a pseudo ends up having to be
> replaced with (plus (reg SP) (const_int VERY_LARGE_NUMBER))? Reload
> may end up using a scratch register to construct this address, and it
> will need an add to do that. Better be safe and consider any pseudo
> reloading risky.
>
>
> Other than that, I'm very happy it worked.
Likewise.
I had pondered similar solutions, but rejected them as imparing
optimization in too many ways. Some optimizers are more effective
when moves are "simple".
jeff
More information about the Gcc
mailing list