autoconfiscating top level directory -- info wanted
Nathanael Nerode
neroden@doctormoo.dyndns.org
Fri Jan 25 14:49:00 GMT 2002
DJ Delorie wrote:
>>* I'll assume that any directory which doesn't appear in the gcc
>>repository or the src repository, and which isn't created by the top
>>level configure script, doesn't exist (and any references to configuring
>>it are obselete and can be removed). Sound reasonable?
>
> I didn't say they didn't exist. I said you don't have to worry about
> them. I think Cygnus used to keep local copies of *everything* and
> use the toplevel script to build it all, but that's no longer the case
> (we have a few extras that gcc+src don't have, but that's not your
> problem).
All right, I've got the first (of several) patches sent to
gcc-patches. This one *only* cleans out makefile targets for nonexistent
directories; it doesn't actually do any autoconfiscation. It does,
however, make the job of autoconfiscation a lot easier for me. Hope this
can get reviewed quickly...
My next patch is to autoconfiscate the remainder of the 'utils'
directory. It *looks* like this is part of GDB, and so should be
submitted to gdb-patches -- is this correct?
--Nathanael Nerode
neroden@doctor.moo.mud.org
neroden@twcny.rr.com
More information about the Gcc
mailing list