autoconfiscating top level directory -- info wanted

Nathanael Nerode neroden@doctormoo.dyndns.org
Fri Jan 25 14:49:00 GMT 2002


DJ Delorie wrote:

>>* I'll assume that any directory which doesn't appear in the gcc 
>>repository or the src repository, and which isn't created by the top 
>>level configure script, doesn't exist (and any references to configuring 
>>it are obselete and can be removed).  Sound reasonable?
> 
> I didn't say they didn't exist.  I said you don't have to worry about
> them.  I think Cygnus used to keep local copies of *everything* and
> use the toplevel script to build it all, but that's no longer the case
> (we have a few extras that gcc+src don't have, but that's not your
> problem).

All right, I've got the first (of several) patches sent to
gcc-patches.  This one *only* cleans out makefile targets for nonexistent
directories; it doesn't actually do any autoconfiscation.  It does,
however, make the job of autoconfiscation a lot easier for me.  Hope this
can get reviewed   quickly...

My next patch is to autoconfiscate the remainder of the 'utils'
directory.  It *looks* like this is part of GDB, and so should be
submitted to gdb-patches -- is this correct?

--Nathanael Nerode
neroden@doctor.moo.mud.org
neroden@twcny.rr.com





More information about the Gcc mailing list