Remaining host configuration fragments

Paul Koning pkoning@equallogic.com
Wed Jan 16 14:27:00 GMT 2002


>>>>> "Zack" == Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com> writes:

 Zack> On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 11:05:17PM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
 >>  In some cases, we are still trying to support systems with GCC
 >> that the operating system vendors stopped supporting years ago.
 >> To me, this is not an optimal use of scarce resources.
 >> 
 >> I don't have any good bright-line criteria for making that
 >> decision, though.

 Zack> Some candidates for dropping:

 Zack> Architectures which don't support ELF.  Architectures which
 Zack> were never updated to new varargs.  All configurations based on
 Zack> SVR3 or earlier.  All configurations based on 4.3BSD or
 Zack> earlier.  All configurations based on COFF.

 Zack> It is not easy to enumerate these.  For the first one, I have a
 Zack> list:

 Zack> 1750a c4x convex elxsi ns32k romp we32k a29k clipper dsp16xx
 Zack> i960 pdp11 vax

Isn't c4x only about 2 years old?  I haven't used it yet, but a free
software compiler for popular DSP chips would be a very good thing
indeed.   That would cover the dsp16xx as well.

It doesn't seem so strange that they don't support ELF, given that a
DSP application is often just a single chunk of code that completely
owns the machine, no traces of an OS anywhere.

     paul



More information about the Gcc mailing list