ffs?

Richard Henderson rth@redhat.com
Mon Jan 14 13:00:00 GMT 2002


On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 04:00:44PM -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> I see many targets have ffs(3) built in, but I don't see any logic to
> provide it so it's usable in the compiler itself.  Am I mistaken?  If
> not, any objection to my adding it to libiberty?

Please do.


r~



More information about the Gcc mailing list