gcc3 vs 176.gcc

Richard Henderson rth@redhat.com
Thu Jan 10 13:36:00 GMT 2002


On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 12:49:20PM -0800, Joe Buck wrote:
> Also, (2) contains (3), so avoiding double warnings might
> be slightly tricky.

Well, (1) contains (2) as well.  Should be able to order the
checks to make things come out right though.


r~



More information about the Gcc mailing list