[PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
'jtv'
jtv@xs4all.nl
Tue Jan 8 04:58:00 GMT 2002
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 10:44:59AM +0100, Bernard Dautrevaux wrote:
>
> NO; the standard here is clear: any access to a volatile object is a side
> effect (see , and optimization is NOT allowed to eliminate side effects, and
> must do them respecting sequence points, even if it determines that the code
> will in fact do nothing
Thank you. That makes it absolutely clear.
Jeroen
More information about the Gcc
mailing list