SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR
Richard Henderson
rth@redhat.com
Mon Jan 7 15:34:00 GMT 2002
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 10:50:24PM -0000, James Mansion wrote:
> How committed must one be to 3-address representations at this level?
Fairly. Current wisdom is having e.g. both associative and
non-associative PLUS expressions.
> - a way to record that A, B, C, D can be computed in parallel
This is in the same line as the C sequence point problem, which
we wish to represent.
> I'd also be interested to know whether there is a desire or
> intent to do common sub expression optimisations at
> this level close to source?
That is the plan. We'll have a whole suite of global optimizations
done here, as well as the traditional high-level loop transformsations.
r~
More information about the Gcc
mailing list