[PATCH] C undefined behavior fix

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Jan  6, 2002, "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk> wrote:

> On 6 Jan 2002, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Jan  2, 2002, jtv <jtv@xs4all.nl> wrote:
>> 
>> > (Yes, I'm a pedant.  I'm pining for the day when gcc will support the
>> > options "-ffascist -Wanal")
>> 
>> How about introducing the options `-flame -War' :-)

> Patch to add these messages to gcc/future.options preapproved :-).

I'm not sure you really meant it, but I can't help going ahead and
checking this in :-) I suppose a ChangeLog entry is not due, is it?

Index: future.options
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/egcs/gcc/future.options,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -p -c -r1.3 future.options
cvs server: conflicting specifications of output style
*** future.options	1998/12/16 20:55:53	1.3
--- future.options	2002/01/06 21:13:02
*************** Reply-To: friedman@gnu.ai.mit.edu
*** 27,29 ****
--- 27,40 ----
  -mno-dialogue
  -pedophile
  -vomit-frame-pointer
+ 
+ From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
+ Date: 06 Jan 2002 17:37:07 -0200
+ 
+ On Jan 2, 2002, in a long, heated thread concerning the interpretation
+ of certain passages of the C standard, jtv <jtv@xs4all.nl> wrote:
+ 
+ > (Yes, I'm a pedant.  I'm pining for the day when gcc will support the
+ > options "-ffascist -Wanal")
+ 
+ How about introducing the options `-flame -War' :-)



-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me