[PATCH] C undefined behavior fix

Florian Weimer fw@deneb.enyo.de
Sun Jan 6 00:03:00 GMT 2002


"Albert D. Cahalan" <acahalan@cs.uml.edu> writes:

> Consider a machine like the CISC-based (non-PowerPC) AS/400.
> There wasn't any hardware-enforced memory protection, but the
> OS was secure. Your ability to create a pointer was restricted.

Somebody took the GCC frontend and added a JVM backend, BTW, and he
claims that the result is a conforming compiler.  Of course, this is
possible, but I haven't checked...



More information about the Gcc mailing list