[PATCH] C undefined behavior fix

[Gabriel Dos Reis]

dewar@gnat.com writes:

| <<You're quoting a *note*, that is a non-normative text which can be bogus
| without affecting the C standard.
| >>
| 
| sure, but what makes you think this note is bogus.

Have I ever said that note was in effect bogus?  Please do reread what
I wrote.

| I have not seen anyone
| claim that this is an error in the standard.

Indeed, the point being that a non-normative text can be bogus without
making the standard bogus -- that statement on itself doesn;t say the
note is bogus.  The note in question was quoted by Linus as being what
ths standard says; but that part is *non-normative*.

-- Gaby