Scheduling of asm()

[Paul Koning]

Excerpt of message (sent 4 January 2002) by Richard Henderson:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 05:55:52PM -0500, Paul Koning wrote:
> > Supplying the schedule class seems like the right answer..
> 
> Until you consider how much compiler internals that exposes
> to the user's source code, at which point we can't reasonably
> change anything in the backend any more.

Isn't the same true already?  You're allowed to refer to
target-specific operand letters in the asm statement.  It's arguable
whether those are any less an internal detail than the names of the
"type" attribute.  

       paul