Scheduling of asm()

Falk Hueffner falk.hueffner@student.uni-tuebingen.de
Fri Jan 4 16:10:00 GMT 2002


Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> writes:

> On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 05:55:52PM -0500, Paul Koning wrote:
> > Supplying the schedule class seems like the right answer..
> 
> Until you consider how much compiler internals that exposes to the
> user's source code, at which point we can't reasonably change
> anything in the backend any more.

The constrains for asms also expose these internals. I can't really
see a difference there. Also changing the backend classes wouldn't
break code, only possibly remove performance advantages.

        Falk



More information about the Gcc mailing list