Scheduling of asm()
Falk Hueffner
falk.hueffner@student.uni-tuebingen.de
Fri Jan 4 16:10:00 GMT 2002
Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 05:55:52PM -0500, Paul Koning wrote:
> > Supplying the schedule class seems like the right answer..
>
> Until you consider how much compiler internals that exposes to the
> user's source code, at which point we can't reasonably change
> anything in the backend any more.
The constrains for asms also expose these internals. I can't really
see a difference there. Also changing the backend classes wouldn't
break code, only possibly remove performance advantages.
Falk
More information about the Gcc
mailing list