Succesfull build and install of gcc-3.0.3 on k6-redhat-linux-gnu

Gcc k6 testing account caligula@cam029208.student.utwente.nl
Thu Jan 3 15:24:00 GMT 2002


Ave Janis.

I saw that you put my last report for gcc-3.0.3 on the k6-redhat-linux-gnu 
as a separate entry in buildstat.html.

The only difference with the other k6 entry in that table is just a minor 
upgrade of the glibc rpm. (binutils/gcc/dejagnu are same). All the k6 
builds are from the same machine. I just realised that in my report of the 
first entry I forgot to mention that it was als a modified redhat-7.0. (It's both time from the exact same 
machine)

Wouldn't it make sense to put all my k6 entry's on the same entry?
When a user want's to know the exact versions of gcc/glibc etc ,the user 
can follow the URL of the gcc version he wants info on. Cause then he's 
forwarderd to the original mail I send on the succesfull/unsuccesfull  
build. In that mail the exact util versions are  mentioned.


Greetings Martijn









More information about the Gcc mailing list