Succesfull build and install of gcc-3.0.3 on k6-redhat-linux-gnu
Gcc k6 testing account
caligula@cam029208.student.utwente.nl
Thu Jan 3 15:24:00 GMT 2002
Ave Janis.
I saw that you put my last report for gcc-3.0.3 on the k6-redhat-linux-gnu
as a separate entry in buildstat.html.
The only difference with the other k6 entry in that table is just a minor
upgrade of the glibc rpm. (binutils/gcc/dejagnu are same). All the k6
builds are from the same machine. I just realised that in my report of the
first entry I forgot to mention that it was als a modified redhat-7.0. (It's both time from the exact same
machine)
Wouldn't it make sense to put all my k6 entry's on the same entry?
When a user want's to know the exact versions of gcc/glibc etc ,the user
can follow the URL of the gcc version he wants info on. Cause then he's
forwarderd to the original mail I send on the succesfull/unsuccesfull
build. In that mail the exact util versions are mentioned.
Greetings Martijn
More information about the Gcc
mailing list