gcc 3.0.3 seems to build libstdc++.so.3.0.2

[David Edelsohn]

>>>>> Andreas Jaeger writes:

Andreas> Building gcc 3.0.3 from tar balls, I noticed that libstdc++ is
Andreas> installed as libstdc++.so.3.0.2.  Is this really correct?  Or was
Andreas> there no change that would justify a subminor bump?

Andreas> I found in libstdc++-v3/src/Makefile.am this line:
Andreas> libstdc___la_LDFLAGS = -version-info 3:2:0 -lm

Andreas> Shouldn't we increase this in CVS to 3:4:0?

	Those number are not GCC release numbers.  Read about Versioning
versus version-info and why not to use Versioning in the libtool
documentation.

David