-shared-libgcc vs. -static -static-libgcc
Alexandre Oliva
aoliva@redhat.com
Wed Feb 27 17:51:00 GMT 2002
On Feb 27, 2002, Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> wrote:
> Perhaps I'm missing something, but I would think that passing
> -shared-libgcc down as part of CXXFLAGS instead of part of CXX is also a
> possibility.
What difference would it make? It would end up being used for any C++
compilation just the same, no?
>> I'll look into implementing all of the above, even though any one of
>> them would suffice. But I think having the 3 of them would make it
>> more consistent. Any disagreement?
> I think that would be wonderful.
Will do.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer
More information about the Gcc
mailing list