Performance with IA64
Tim Prince
tprince@computer.org
Sat Feb 23 20:57:00 GMT 2002
On Friday 22 February 2002 01:20, Thomas Hiller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tested the gcc 3.0.2 (and gcc 3.1 at that time) and got in the end a
> 25% degradation compared to the Win64 compiler.
Just curious; is there a general understanding of which compiler is meant? I
have used only the Microsoft and Intel compilers for Windows, each of which
is in a different pricing and support model category. I would be surprised
if there were a gcc for Win64; even more surprised if it performed better
than on linux.
>
> Have the current 3.1 snapshots optimization for IA64 that can change the
> picture ?
> What are the plans to get at least near to Win64 ?
>
> I'm using Linux on IA64.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Best regards,
> Thomas
More information about the Gcc
mailing list