-MM, 2.95 vs 3.0

[Neil Booth]

Ian Britten wrote:-

> [ FYI - Reminder... 
>   Note that GCC v3.0.1 does _not_ behave as you/Neil describe (ie. that the
>   dependencies are for all non-SYSTEM files), but is still as I described
>   (Only files included via "").  Newer versions may work the way you
>   describe (Haven't tried yet), but if you think 3.0.1 behaves the way you
>   describe, there may be a bug in it... ]

Yah, like I said (in the newsgroup) 3.0.x's idea of a "system header
file" is a little screwy.  3.1 is as I described.

Neil.