Criteria for a warning to be in -Wall? (was: Re: a warning to implement)

[Toon Moene]

Joe Buck wrote:

> It seems to me that if we had an optimization level (call it -O0.5, or
> just adjust -O1) in which, at the end of each line, values get flushed
> back to memory, we'd pretty much have it: complicated expressions inside
> one line of code could be optimized as much as you want, but the
> developer in the debugger would see just what he wrote.

Do you mean the 66 columns between column 7 and 72 or the (potentially)
1320 characters in a 39-line continuation ?

[ Just kiddin' ]

-- 
Toon Moene - mailto:toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phoneto: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG  Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html
Join GNU Fortran 95: http://g95.sourceforge.net/ (under construction)