Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions?

[Paolo Carlini]

Andreas Jaeger wrote:

>Tell me if you like to see other runs,
>
Thank you very much, Andreas.

>164.gzip          1400       561       250*     1400       559       250*
>
>186.crafty        1000       279       358*     1000       279       358*
>
Really indistinguishable, right?

>Est. SPECint_base2000                  227
>   Est. SPECint2000                                                     227
>
Andreas, please excuse my *very* stupid question (for sure I could find 
this explained somewhere in your pages ;-)
How these SPEC indexes compare with those you publish on the WEB? I mean 
they are roughly half in size.

Thanks, Paolo.