a warning to implement

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Feb  3, 2002, dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) wrote:

>>> It's not clearly bogus.  It's explicitly allowed in the Standard.
> It is a self evident fact that *ALL* warnings are about things that are
> allowed in the standard, or instead you would be posting an error message
> so the above statement is a rather curious non-sequitur.

I see.  Point taken.  I withdraw my objection.  Thanks for keeping me
straight :-)

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist                Professional serial bug killer